← Back to the websiteES
Technical insight · Connectivity

Choosing connectivity for remote monitoring in the Puna: LoRa, cellular or satellite

Fernando Bergami · Sound Engineer · November 7, 2026

Before choosing sensors, a more basic question needs answering: how will data reach you from a site with no power grid and often no cellular signal? This article explains my approach to designing a remote monitoring station, with calculations you can check.

A note on the numbers. The calculations below are theoretical and use example values. They help assess whether a link is feasible on paper. Field measurements are always necessary. Future articles will present our own range measurements.

1. The three options at a glance

LoRa (dedicated radio link)Cellular 4G / LTESatellite
Monthly feeNone for radio data transmissionData plan or subscriptionSubscription or per-message fee
Power consumptionVery lowModerate, with connection peaksHigh during transmission
Data volumeSmall per messageLargeVery small
Site requirementLine of sight to a gatewayActual coverage, not just a coverage mapClear view of the sky
Best suited toDistributed stations without cellular coverageSites with stable coverageFallback or backup

An often-overlooked detail: the LoRa gateway also needs internet access. At a field camp, this can often use the existing camp connection. Otherwise, cellular or satellite connectivity is still needed, but at a single point rather than at every station.

2. LoRa's practical limit: line of sight

At 915 MHz, free-space path loss between two antennas is calculated as follows:

FSPL (dB) = 32.44 + 20·log₁₀(d in km) + 20·log₁₀(f in MHz)
At 915 MHz: FSPL ≈ 91.7 + 20·log₁₀(d)

At 30 km, the result is approximately 121 dB. Here is the link budget, using conservative example values:

Transmit power .................... +20 dBm
Combined antenna gain (3+3) ....... +6 dBi
Cable and connector losses ....... −2 dB
Receiver sensitivity ............. −130 dBm (conservative example)
──────────────────────────────────
Total link budget ................ 154 dB
Path loss at 30 km (free space) ... 121 dB
Fade margin ...................... ≈ 33 dB

On paper, there is plenty of margin. Why, then, do links fail? At 915 MHz, the limiting factor is often that something obstructs the path: the Earth's curvature or a hill.

Station Elevated gateway Sufficient antenna height clears the obstacle Gray line: terrain can block the link despite a generous link budget
Illustrative diagram, not to scale.

Radio horizon

Under standard atmospheric conditions, the approximate maximum line-of-sight distance between two antennas over flat terrain is:

d (km) ≈ 4.12 · ( √h₁ + √h₂ ) with h₁ and h₂ in meters

The practical takeaway: good gateway placement can be more valuable than extra transmit power. Raising the gateway by a few tens of meters can greatly increase range, while increasing transmit power adds only a few dB.

The Fresnel zone

Seeing the other antenna is not enough: the first Fresnel zone, an ellipsoidal volume around the direct path, also needs clearance. Its radius at the midpoint is:

r (m) ≈ 8.66 · √( d in km / f in GHz )

For a 30 km link at 0.915 GHz, the radius is approximately 50 m. A common design rule is to keep at least 60% of that radius clear: about 30 m around the direct path at midspan. This is why paths through a ravine or close to a hillside can be problematic even when there is visual line of sight.

3. Power: what changes at high altitude

4. Making the decision in practice

  1. Assess the site: identify possible station locations and an elevated gateway position.
  2. Check cellular coverage with an actual test at each point, rather than relying on the operator's map.
  3. Calculate the link budget using the terrain profile and an adequate design margin.
  4. Test in the field before permanent installation, using the actual equipment and antennas.
  5. Choose a backup for critical data, whether local storage or a second link.

A regulatory consideration: permitted transmit power and frequency bands depend on current Argentine regulations. Before finalizing a design, check the applicable limits with the relevant authority (ENACOM) and the equipment specifications.

Considering a remote monitoring project?

Tell us what you need to measure and where. A site assessment helps identify the appropriate connectivity option.

Get in touch by email

Related article: Environmental noise in the Puna: wind, low background levels and continuous monitoring.

Fernando Bergami
Fernando BergamiSound Engineer. Developing embedded systems and telemetry since 2012. Based in Salta.